The Science and Politics of Neglected-Disease Research: Philosophical, Bioethical and Sociological Perspectives on International Health Inequalities
Tuesday, 9 December 2008
|
9.00 |
Coffee and Tea |
|
9.15 |
Session Four – The Implementation of Novel Research Strategies Chair: Stefan Ecks, What are the practical obstacles to developing and implementing research strategies aimed at more globally equal health outcomes? How can they be overcome? |
|
|
Prof. Michael Parker, The Ethox Centre, Division of Public Health and |
|
|
Dr. Joel Lexchin, |
|
11.00 |
Coffee and Tea |
|
11.30 |
Session Five – Donor groups, the limitations of philanthrocapitalism and the role of the public sector Chair:Pascale Brudon, Health Action International What are the unintended adverse effects of the contemporary regime of biomedical research and how can they be reduced? Does the emergence of ‘philanthrocapitalism’ provide solutions, or is it part of the problem? |
|
|
Dr. Tido von Schoen-Angerer, Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines, MSF |
|
|
Dr. Nicolas Guilhot, Social Science Research Council, |
|
1.15 |
Lunch |
|
2.30 |
Session Six – The Promise of ResearchChair: Johannes Hunger, the Global Fund What are promising local or global initiatives in the fight against neglected diseases? What are the new methodological strategies and empirical concepts? What organizational forms care best suited to encouraging such research?
|
|
|
Dr. Charles Gardner, Global Forum For Health Research |
|
|
Dr. Detlef Niese, Novartis |
|
4.30 |
Closing discussion |
Monday, 8 December 2008
|
11.30 |
Registration (including tea, coffee and buffet lunch) Brocher Foundation, Hermance, |
|
12.30 |
Opening Remarks – Reframing Theoretical and Methodological Priorities |
|
12.45 |
Session One – The Prioritization of Research Chair: Malebona Precious Matsoso, Secretariat on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property, WHO Is the demand to reorganise biomedical research in order to address the neglected-disease problem normatively justified? Are consumers in the developed world obliged to finance research into diseases that predominantly affect inhabitants in developing regions, and if so, why – for reasons of ethics, self-interest etc.? |
|
|
Prof. Athar Hussain, Asia Research Centre, |
|
|
Prof. Dan Brock, Division of Medical Ethics, |
|
2.30 |
Coffee and Tea |
|
2.45 |
Session Two – The Organization of Research Chair: TBC How can research be reorganised such that it focuses on the world’s major causes of disease and death irrespective of the wealth or poverty of those who are at risk? In particular, how can research into neglected diseases be incentivised, and what are effective IP regimes and other methods to assist in this shift in priorities? |
|
|
Prof. James Robert Brown, Department of Philosophy, |
|
|
James Love, Knowledge Ecology International |
|
4.30 |
Coffee and tea |
|
4.45 |
Session Three – The Evidence-Base of Research Chair: Sisule F. Musungu, IQsensato Are current research methodologies likely to generate medical treatments that work in the conditions commonly found in countries affected by neglected diseases? What kinds of interdisciplinary research is likely to be of most use in understanding the causes and the effective treatments of such diseases and how can this be encouraged? How can current research methods be made more suited to the local circumstances in which such diseases need to be combated? |
|
|
Dr. Ann Kelly, Health Policy Unit, |
|
|
Dr. Alex Broadbent, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, |
|
6.45 |
Shuttle to Symposium Dinner, Café Papon |